Skip to main content

Fallout 4 (not a review)

 A couple of days ago I read this curious statement at Gamespot forums, and even when I have no doubts that Fallout 4 is an RPG, I agree with most of the points. What Im not so sure is that Fallout 4 is Fallout at all. I have been playing the game for a week, but from the very first minutes I knew something: Im dissapointed.

It is not that Bethesda killed most of the original game spirit when the went the FPS path, thats old story. The problem is that they are killing the few Fallout elements left, so, dont be surprised if for Fallout 5 we dont have even the SPECIAL. The Fallout skills system have been with us since the first title, and it worked, but seems that somebody decided that I would be better to simplify it. Im usually a peaceful people that dislikes hurting living beings, but Im utterly sure that the author of such unfortunate idea should be hanged by the balls.

There is a trend of changing gameplay in each franchise iteration, even when it is proven and fun, just for the sake of changing. It is annoying. But people keeps paying for such games, so they think it works and it is desirable. Dont know you, but for me, it is not.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Isometric camera with Godot

Took some effort and some of my sleep hours, but at last, I made it. Here is my first videotutorial: implementing an isometric camera in 3D, with Godot. Useful if you want to emulate the look of old classics like Fallout 2, but with some extra features. Considering that my voice is not so nice, and my english pronounciation is even worse, I also added texts to help you underestand what Im saying. You will also notice some background noise, but cant do anything to solve that. Any suggestion is welcome. Expect another tutorial soon.... or sor tof. This time, will be about my AI system.
Post a Comment
Read more

Lessons about game dev

 Meet Bobby (not Kotick)! He is going to taught you a lesson about how NOT to make games. Bobby is a very sharp bussinessman, that sees everybody is playing games. More important, everybody is spending money in games. What would any smart bussinessman do? Well, get into the games bussiness, and he knows he has an advantage. See, Bobby is not going to spend hundredths of thousands dollars to make a game, when he can make it much cheaper.  And here comes the first mistake. Bobby goes to his birth city, in a shitty third class communist country, where it is easier to find a honest politician than a game developer. There, he assembles the Avengers... I mean, a team of talented guys that... never made a game in their lives. He invests in hardware, with good workstations equipped with fairly modern GPUs, pairde with the worst, cheapest 18 inches display you can get. Also, a server with a 24 VRAM GPU, because any game studio needs a server for... nobody knows exactly for what, but t...
3 comments
Read more

Vulkan and open source engines

It is weird, but even when Vulkan has embraced the open source philosophy (open drivers, tools, etc), Im not seeing too much enthusiasm to adopt it in open source game engines. I have been following mostly Godot and Urho3D, yet Ogre3D and Irrlicht doesnt seems to be rushing to implement the new renderers. It is worth to mention that Godot promissed they would delay the long needed refactoring of its 3D renderer until Vulkan release, but now they say they wont be using it, favoring GL ES 3 instead. The other engines seems to be dealing with lack of man power (Urho3D leader left the work on hands of community, as he is not working on Vulkan renderer right now) and base code designed for older APIs, specifically, DirectX 9. Lot of work is required to adapt this code base, not only for Vulkan, but for DirectX 12 too. Well, nobody said that developing a game engine was easy. The advantages of Vulkan have been widely detailed. From engine point of view, it would centralize all renderers...
3 comments
Read more